Uncertainty Analysis Procedure |
Clean Air Engineering | |
Kelly Aita |
Overview |
Estimate the current measurement uncertainties that exist in testing | ||
Proves to clients that we are the leader in the field | ||
Gives clients additional tool to show compliance | ||
Creates quantitative tool that can be used to reduce these uncertainties | ||
Analysis evaluates the uncertainty in testing, not the method | ||
Assuming the EPA method has no uncertainty in itself | ||
Essentially the uncertainty measurement involves no Bias created by a faulty method. |
Background |
Uncertainty quantification is very judgmental and requires experience and understanding of the testing method | |
Continuously changing method which should be constantly monitored and updated |
Introduction |
The quantity being determined is defined by Y | |||
Parameters (inputs) used to describe Y are X1, X2, X3 É Xi. | |||
These quantities are estimated by the terms y, x1, x2, x3 Éxi. | |||
Uncertainties | |||
The standard uncertainty of an input is u(xi) | |||
The combined standard uncertainty is uc(y), | |||
The expanded uncertainty is the value which is reported. |
Procedure |
Write down equations that are used in calculations | ||
Determine uncertainty sources | ||
Variables being measured | ||
Contributions due to the testing process (some research might be necessary) | ||
Evaluate sensitivity of each parameter | ||
Can be done numerically using software |
Procedure (contÕd) |
Evaluate covariance between all parameters | ||
Needs to be completed only once for each process | ||
Calculate combined uncertainty u(y) | ||
Calculate expanded uncertainty K*u(y) |
Systematic Uncertainties |
Provided by manufacturer (x±a) | |||
Interpreted by own judgment according to probability distribution | |||
Experimentally | |||
Taking n measurements and using standard deviation s | |||
Theoretical | |||
Using coefficient of thermal expansion to derive volumetric uncertainty | |||
EPA methods as listed minimum accuracy |
Probability Distribution |
Triangular distribution | |
Rectangular distribution |
Probability Distribution |
Normal distribution | ||||
Manufacturer can report in different forms | ||||
Standard Deviation u(x) = s | ||||
Relative Standard Deviation | ||||
Coefficient of Variance | ||||
Uncertainty Interval (±c) | ||||
95% u(x) =c/2 | ||||
99% u(x) =c/3 |
Sensitivity Parameter, |
The sensitivity quantifies the effect the parameter has on the output | |||
Solve analytically | |||
Solve Experimentally | |||
alter xi while observing the effect to y | |||
Solve numerically | |||
Assume linear relation or u/x is very small | |||
Covariance |
Correlation between two input variables effect the combined standard uncertainty (The effect of one parameter might negate the effect of the other) | ||
Determining Degree of Covariance, rik |
u(xi,xk) = u(xi)u(xk)rik for -1<rik<1 | ||
Previous tests | ||
With enough data can calculate rik for a particular test/situation | ||
Analytical | ||
Experience | ||
Can make an educated guess about value of r |
Random Uncertainty |
Involves the dispersion of data due to random effects | ||
Evaluated using sample variance s | ||
Normal Distribution (for n > 30) | ||
t- distribution (n < 30) |
Combined Uncertainty |
Combine everything together | |
u(y) essentially represents a standard deviation |
Expanded Uncertainty, K*u(y) |
The reported uncertainty must include a description of what it is showing | |||
Confidence interval | |||
Probability that any data taken is within uncertainty limits | |||
Changes with distribution and degrees of freedom | |||
Certain limit (i.e. 3s) | |||
Determining K |
t or z value taken from table or software | ||
Based on degrees of freedom (n-1) | ||
Must specify Confidence Interval (95% or 99% typically) | ||
Spreadsheet developed for this purpose | ||
Conclusion |
Uncertainty analysis is conducted to allow the client to verify we provide the highest quality service | |
Analysis is dynamic process and ever changing | |
A rough Spreadsheet template has been created to begin process | |
Process creates valuable way to audit ourselves and increase quality |